WHO DO WE THINK WE ARE?What are we as Christians known for? Here in Ecuador the first thing a nonbeliever will mention about Christians sounds like this: "Oh, you are an evangelical? You know, you don't drink, smoke, or dance." And sadly enough, the typical christian will say, "Yep--that's right!"
Even though we've lived outside of the U.S. for almost 15 years, I can imagine the question being phrased like this in America: "Oh, you are a Christian? You know, a republican, gun-toting, capitol-punishment favoring, militant?"
Impossible? Not from what I read and hear--and no, I am not listening to voices of the radical left.
Case in Point:
PAT ROBERTSON CALLS FOR ASSASSINATION OF HUGO CHAVEZVIRGINIA BEACH (AP) — Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson suggested on-air that American operatives assassinate Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to stop his country from becoming "a launching pad for communist infiltration and Muslim extremism.""We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability," Robertson said Monday on the Christian Broadcast Network's The 700 Club.I find it apalling that someone so visibly linked with Christianity would speak such a thing and the fact that he has done so demonstrates a personal lack of comprehension regarding Christianity. However, what I find even more appalling is that
there will not be a large and vocal outcry from the Christian community.
What does scripture teach? There is no doubt that God has ordained governments and invested them to use force--the question is the role of the Christian. This question at hand is not just a theological one, but should be considered a historical one as well. Though U.S. christianity today condones war, was it always so?
Consider the following and try to read the scriptures as if you were learning of the Christian lifestyle for the first time:
You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also. And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him two. Matt. 5:38-41
Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here." John 18:36
For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds. 2 Cor. 10:3, 4
HOW DID CHRISTIANS UNDERSTAND THIS ISSUE DURING THE FIRST 300 YEARS OF CHRISTIANITY?
We who formerly murdered one another now refrain from making war even upon our enemies. Justin Martyr cerca 160ad
We have learned not to return blow for blow, nor to go to law with those who plunder and rob us. Instead, even to those who strike us on one side of the face, we offer the other side also. Athenagoras c. 175ad.
If, then, we are commanded to love our enemies, whom have we to hate? If injured, we are forbidden to retaliate, lest we become just as bad ourselves. Who can suffer injury at our hands? Tertullian c. 197.
Nowhere does He teach that it is right for His own disciples to offer violence to anyone, howeer wicked. For He deemed the killing of any individual to be against His laws, which were divine in origin...These laws do not even allow them on any occasion to resist their persecutors, even when they are called to be slaughtered as sheep. Origen Against Celsus
There are many other passages, but until Constantine declared that he was given a heavenly sign of the cross under which he would fight and be victorious,
Christianity from it's inception had no dealings with war or the causing of death of another.
This even caused problems in the early church when soldiers became christians. The response was immediate and firm: you either get transfered to a non-combatant role, or you deny service and risk death, but you were not to take a life. Listen to how one church leader responded to the Romans about how christians were to serve their country--for the early christians DID support their country, however they did so in a different way:
"We are urged 'to help the king with all our might, to work with him in the preservation of justice, to fight for him, and if he requires it to fight under him, or to lead an army along with him.'
"Our answer is that we do, when occasion requires, give help to kings, but in a divine way, 'putting on the whole armor of God.' We do this in obedience to the injunction of the apostle, 'I urge, therefore, first of all, that supplications, prayers, intercessions and thanksgiving be made for all men--for kings and for all those in authority'. The more anyone excels in holiness, the more effective is his help to kings, even more than is given by soldiers who go out to fight and slay as many of the enemy as they can.
"To those enemies of our faith who would require us to bear arms for the empire and to slay men, we reply, "Do not the priests who attend [your gods]...keep their hands free from blood, so that they may offer the appointed sacrifices to your gods with hands unstained and free from human blood?' Even when war is upon you, you never enlist the priests in the army. If, then, that is a praiseworthy custom, how much more so that while others are engaged in battle, [Christians] too should engage as the priests and ministers of God, keeping their hands pure.... By our prayers we vanquish all demons who stir up war.... In this way, we are much more helpful to the kings than those who go into the field to fight for them... And none fight better for the king than we do. Indeed, we refuse to fight under him, even if he demands it. But we do fight on his behalf, forming a special army--and army of righteousness--by offering our prayers to God." Origen
Against Celsus bk. 3, chap. 7
We must admit that Christians in the U.S. not only support war but do so even more fervently than the general population at large. As one author pointed out, there has been no war in the entire history of the United States that evangelical Christians opposed in any significant numbers.
While I raise theological questions regarding this, and while I believe that history is clear regarding the refusal of the early christians to participate, I am ashamed that a visible Christian in leadership would encourage the assassination of another person and sadder still that few christian voices will rise in protest.